Are Your Clinical, Coding, and Quality Workflows Actually Built for How Value-Based Care Pays?
A structured VBC performance assessment that examines how well your documentation practices, risk capture workflows, and quality reporting align to what your value-based contracts measure, where gaps are affecting shared savings and outcomes performance, and what it will take to close them.
Start your assessment
Revenue That Depends on Outcomes You May Not Be Fully Documenting
In value-based care, what gets documented determines what gets measured, and what gets measured determines what gets paid. Organizations that haven’t evaluated how thoroughly their clinical documentation reflects the full patient journey are likely leaving contract performance on the table without knowing it.
Risk Scores That Don't Reflect the True Complexity of Your Population
When chronic conditions go uncaptured or underdocumented across your attributed population, RAF scores underrepresent patient complexity, shared savings benchmarks shift unfavorably, and reimbursement falls short of what the care you are delivering actually warrants.
Quality Measures Being Reported Without a Clear View of Where You Stand
Many organizations invest significantly in care delivery but lack a structured way to evaluate whether their quality reporting accurately reflects that investment. Without benchmarking current measure performance, it is difficult to know which gaps are costing the most or which improvements would move the needle fastest under contract.
35%
More Accurate RAF Capture
23%
Increase in Overall RAF Scores
34%
Annual Wellness Visit Capture Rate Increase
69%
Transitional Care Management Reporting Increase
What the Value-Based Care Assessment Covers
A structured evaluation of your VBC program’s performance across risk capture, documentation quality, quality measure reporting, and contract alignment, with findings benchmarked against industry standards and a prioritized improvement plan your teams can act on.
Share Your Population and Contract Data
Provide encounter records, quality reporting data, and details about your current VBC contract structure to give our team a complete starting point. We use this to evaluate how your clinical and coding workflows line up against the specific metrics and benchmarks that govern your contracts.
Evaluate, Benchmark & Identify Where Performance Is Falling Short
Our VBC specialists assess your risk capture accuracy, HCC coding completeness, quality measure performance, and documentation alignment against national benchmarks and contract-specific requirements, identifying exactly where gaps are affecting shared savings eligibility, risk scores, and outcomes reporting.
Walk Away With a Roadmap Tied to Your Actual Contracts
Your assessment delivers a structured findings report and a live expert walkthrough that translates every gap identified into a practical improvement recommendation, ranked by contract impact so your population health, quality, and finance teams know exactly where to focus first.
Capture the Risk. Report the Quality. Earn What the Contract Promises.
A Detailed View of Where VBC Performance Is Underdelivering
The assessment maps gaps across risk documentation, chronic condition capture, care gap closure, and quality measure reporting using your actual population and contract data, so leadership gets a specific, evidence-based picture of what is driving the distance between your clinical effort and your contract outcomes.
Every Gap Measured Against What Your Contracts Require
Unlike a generic benchmarking exercise, your VBC assessment evaluates each finding in the context of your specific contract structure, shared savings thresholds, and quality targets, so you understand not just what is underperforming but what each gap is actually costing you under the terms you have agreed to.
An Improvement Plan Built Around How Your Organization Operates
The recommendations that come out of the assessment are designed to work within your existing care delivery model, documentation workflows, and coding infrastructure, not around an idealized version of how a VBC program should work that ignores your operational reality.
7–35%
Most organizations that complete a structured value-based care performance assessment identify meaningful gaps in risk capture accuracy, quality measure reporting completeness, and documentation alignment that have been quietly limiting contract performance across shared savings, risk adjustment, and outcomes benchmarks.
The assessment gives you the baseline, the benchmark, and a contract-aligned path to close those gaps before the next performance period ends.